Is a Ground-Source Heat Pump the Right Choice?

admin fofabvlic , , , , , , ,

first_imgChicago is not too cold for a minisplitHolladay and Dorsett both discount Rush’s concerns that Chicago winters might be too cold for a minisplit (a type of air-source heat pump).Holladay points out that Vermont homeowners have been heating their homes with Mitsubishi and Fujitsu minisplits even when the air temperature outside drops to -20°F. “So,” he says, “I think your concern is misplaced.”Dorsett agrees that there are many houses heated with minisplits in colder areas than Chicago.“The primary differences are in net efficiency, upfront cost, and heat distribution,” Dorsett says. “A typical GSHP will deliver an annual COP [coefficient of performance] of about 3.5; best-in-class systems will be a bit north of 4.5. Five years ago a right-sized ductless system would tip just north of an average COP of 3, but typical systems would run between 2.5 and 3.“The cool climate minisplit technology has improved in the past five years, and if done right it’s possible to hit a COP north of 3.5 with ductless systems, or north of 3 with best-in-class mini-ducted minisplits,” Dorsett continues. “From a net cost point of view, it’s often cheaper to go with minisplit and a slightly larger rooftop PV [photovoltaic] array to cover the additional power use of the lower efficiency than it is to go with better-class GSHP, but pricing varies (a lot) from location to location.”He recalled a retrofit in which a three-story house was heated with a single Mitsubishi minisplit head per floor. Although the units had no specified output capacity when the outdoor temperature was -13°F or colder, the minisplits had “no trouble” keeping up when the temperature hit -16°F and didn’t break out of positive single digits for a few days.“The total cost for the three minisplits was about $13,000,” Dorsett says, “about one-third what it would have cost to install a single GSHP system big enough to handle the load in my area.” “I really like the idea of GSHPs,” he continues, “for two theoretical reasons, and one practical one: A) In zone 5, the soil is cooler than the air in summer — and warmer than the air in winter. Why would I want to put heat into 90° F. air or take heat out of 10° F. air? B) The volumetric heat capacity of soil is about 1000 times that of air; and C) in Chicago, occasionally it might be too cold to heat with a minisplit (not sure if that’s three times a year — or once every three years — but it could happen), but it will never be too cold to heat with a GSHP.”Rush’s questions are the starting point for this Q&A Spotlight. Ben Rush likes the idea of a ground-source heat pump, despite their reputation for higher cost than other heating and cooling alternatives.A ground-source heat pump (GSHPs) requires heat-exchange tubing buried in the ground or inserted in a well or pond. The excavation required to bury the lines (or drill an extra well or two) helps to make GSHPs more expensive than air-source units. In addition, the equipment itself tends to be more costly. In all, GSHPs suffer a significant disadvantage when it comes to cost.Even so, Rush thinks they make sense, and he wonders if he’s put his finger on a way to bring down the cost of installing a new system.“To address the first issue, could the ground loop go under a basement floor?” he asks in a Q&A post at GreenBuildingAdvisor. “Would any additional excavation be required? How much? Would 2 or 3 inches of sub-slab foam insulation be enough to separate the conditioned basement from the year-round +/-55F (Climate Zone 5) soil? Bottom line: would this be an inexpensive — yet effective — way to install the ground loop? Heat Pumps: The BasicsAir-Source of Ground-Source Heat PumpGround-Source Heat Pumps Don’t Save EnergyAre Affordable Ground-Source Heat Pumps On the Horizon?Podcast: Ground-Source Heat Pumps, Part 1: The BasicsPodcast: Ground-Source Heat Pumps, Part 2: Rules of ThumbPodcast: Ground-Source Heat Pumps, Part 3: Five QuestionsAir-Source or Ground-Source Heat Pump?Is a Ground-Source Heat Pump a Renewable Energy System?Ground-Source Heat Pumps Have Low Operating Costs Sub-slab tubing will not workThere are three problems with Rush’s proposal, replies GBA senior editor Martin Holladay. First, heat-exchange tubing needs to be placed in deep trenches, with lots of soil around it. “Digging deep trenches under a slab undermines the footings, and it’s expensive,” he says. Second, there isn’t enough area under a basement slab for the amount of tubing that would be required. Third, he says, a ground loop lowers the temperature of the soil around it, and Rush’s proposed placement risks freezing the soil under his house, “an undesirable outcome.”On the relatively high cost of GSHP equipment, Holladay adds, “some theorists” believe the 30% federal tax credit is a contributor. “In other words, manufacturers keep prices high because they know they can,” he says. “The equipment cost is subsidized (and, arguably, artificially increased) by the federal government.”Tubing laid in the ground like a Slinky typically needs five to ten times the footprint of the house, adds Dana Dorsett, but it’s sometimes possible to drill wells under the slab for the tubing.“In the Netherlands (where the water table is high everywhere, where drilling through layers of peat, sand, and clay is cheap and easy, and where the outside design temperatures are modest), single-well systems taking only a few square meters of real estate have been used to heat and cool high-R row houses,” Dorsett says. “It may or may not be cheaper than minisplits, but the European preference for hydronic heating systems with low temperature panel radiators or radiant floors makes GSHPs a reasonable choice when the work can be done cheaply.”That’s more challenging in a code-minimum house in Chicago, he says, because the cooling loads are higher, the outside design temperatures are lower, and the geology is different.center_img RELATED ARTICLES Our expert’s opinionHere’s GBA technical director Peter Yost:There is certainly no shortage of GBA information on ground source heat pumps (GSHPs). I would pay particular attention to Henry Gifford’s article, “Ground-Source Heat Pumps Don’t Save Energy.” The comments section of that post also contain valuable information.I remain unconvinced that for single-family detached homes the best investment for high performance is a GSHP. There are well-designed GSHP systems, for sure, but they tend to be better suited to larger projects and remain difficult to install properly. Finding qualified installers remains challenging.There is “new” (2014) guidance on the design of GSHPs from ASHRAE: Geothermal Heating and Cooling: Design of Ground Source Heat Pump Systems. This version updates the 2007 guide, which was focused on commercial and institutional buildings, and it includes case studies as well as a new section on site characterization. The new section contains a hydrogeological chapter, an area that when not well understood has led to installation issues. This ASHRAE publication is not inexpensive — but then, neither are GSHPs.Finally, there are a number of papers from the latest (2015) International Ground Source Heat Pump Association conference that may prove useful to those investigating GSHPs or who are involved in their design and installation. Minisplits are still a better dealHeat-exchange tubing is one reason GSHPs are more expensive, Dorsett says, and there are a number of other reasons as well: the equipment is made in lower volumes, while minisplits are a “mass-produced commodity in a very competitive market”; it takes more labor to install a GSHP; and there is a greater risk the system won’t work as planned. Minisplits, on the other hand, are a “system in a can” with fewer things to screw up.There are a few trends that could narrow the cost gap, adds Charlie Sullivan.“For a while, minisplits all had modern variable-speed compressors while GSHPs have single or two-speed compressors,” he writes. “Now some GSPHs with variable-speed compressors are available. This allows higher efficiency in part-load conditions, i.e., most of the time. With variable-speed compressors in both, the efficiency advantage of the GSHP becomes stronger.”In addition, directional drilling to make boreholes for GSHPs is starting to become available. Directional drilling, in which boreholes are made diagonally instead of straight down, can be less expensive: “Whether you’ll really be able to get a cost reduction from this approach depends on the capabilities and pricing structure of local drilling companies, but what I’ve read indicates that you can achieve a substantial price reduction.”That said, Sullivan adds, minisplits are still a better deal.last_img

You May Also Like..

Low heat shock thresholds in wild Antarctic intertidal limpets (Nacella concinna).

first_imgHeat shock proteins (HSPs) are a family of genes classically used to measure levels of organism stress. We have previously identified two HSP70 genes (HSP70A and HSP70B) in sub-tidal populations of the Antarctic limpet (Nacella concinna). These genes are up-regulated in response to increased seawater temperatures of 15°C or more during acute heat shock experiments, temperatures that have very little basis when considering the current Antarctic ecology of these animals. Therefore, the question was posed as to whether these animals could express HSP70 genes when subjected to more complex environmental conditions, such as those that occur in the inter-tidal. Inter-tidal limpets were collected on three occasions in different weather conditions at South Cove, Rothera Point, over a complete tidal cycle, and the expression levels of the HSP70 genes were measured. Both genes showed relative up-regulation of gene expression over the period of the tidal cycle. The average foot temperature of these animals was 3.3°C, far below that of the acute heat shock experiments. These experiments demonstrate that the temperature and expression levels of HSP production in wild animals cannot be accurately extrapolated from experimentally induced treatments, especially when considering the complexity of stressors in the natural environment. However, experimental manipulation can provide molecular markers for identifying stress in Antarctic molluscs, provided it is accompanied by environmental validation, as demonstrated here.last_img

Tropical convective transport and the Walker circulation

first_imgWe introduce a methodology to visualise rapid vertical and zonal tropical transport pathways. Using prescribed sea-surface temperatures in four monthly model integrations for 2005, we characterise preferred transport routes from the troposphere to the stratosphere in a high resolution climate model. Most efficient transport is modelled over the Maritime Continent (MC) in November and February, i.e., boreal winter. In these months, the ascending branch of the Walker Circulation over the MC is formed in conjunction with strong deep convection, allowing fast transport into the stratosphere. In the model the upper tropospheric zonal winds associated with the Walker Circulation are also greatest in these months in agreement with ERA-Interim reanalysis data. We conclude that the Walker circulation plays an important role in the seasonality of fast tropical transport from the lower and middle troposphere to the upper troposphere and so impacts at the same time the potential supply of surface emissions to the tropical tropopause layer (TTL) and subsequently to the stratosphere.last_img

NFL and players’ union agree to reduced team salary limits

first_img Written by FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailEricVega/iStockBy CARMEN COX, ABC News(NEW YORK) — The NFL and the NFL Players Association have reached an agreement on team salary caps. On Wednesday, the league and its players’ union agreed to cap each team’s salary at $182.5 million in 2021 — down 8% from last season, according to a memo obtained by ESPN.In previous years, teams saw increasing salary caps as league revenues continued to rise. But as the COVID-19 pandemic forced city and statewide lockdowns, game attendance fell by 92% and caused a decline in 2020 revenues.Teams must comply with the new salary cap limits by next Wednesday at 4 p.m. ET — the start of the new league year. The decreased limits will likely mean teams will have to make difficult roster decisions and release a significantly high number of players into the free agent market to bring team salaries below the league’s required cap.As COVID restrictions relax and the NFL works to lock in new broadcasting deals, pro football attendance and revenues are expected to rebound in the 2021 season.Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved. March 10, 2021 /Sports News – National NFL and players’ union agree to reduced team salary limitscenter_img Beau Lundlast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *