Why Today’s Job Interview Is So Grueling

admin cxfhhv , , , , , , ,

first_imgHiring the wrong job candidate can cost a company serious money, which is why it’s all too common to make job seekers go through a multi-phase interview process. It may seem cumbersome or downright annoying to the candidate going through it, but career experts say it’s necessary in today’s job market.“Competition is tough, especially for professions where there isn’t a skills shortage,” says Vinda Rao, the marketing manager at Bullhorn, a recruitment software company. “More and more companies are using personality and intelligence tests to weed out applicants and it usually takes more than just one interview with one person to gauge if someone is a fit.”According to career experts it’s not uncommon for a job candidate to go through multiple phases starting with an initial interview over the phone. Once they’ve passed the first screening process, many companies will have a job candidate take personality and intelligence tests, meet with human resources and then interview with the hiring manager. Companies will even make the candidate undergo a multi-day try out, interview with a panel of people or even the entire team before deciding on who it will hire. There’s even those companies that take it to the next level by requiring a FBI type background check or require them to write a series of essays.All of that may seem like overkill to a candidate, but there is a method to the madness. After all a company is only as good as their employees and if they continually hire the wrong people it will not only cost them money but will hurt their ability to run the business. “By using different phases, the company can get to know an applicant better, before the hire, plus get feedback from several members of the organization,” says Joel Garfinkle, author of Getting Ahead: Three Steps to Take Your Career to the Next Level.  “Additionally, interviewing in short phases minimizes the amount the company invests in a candidate, if they are able to determine early on they aren’t suitable for the position.”Take the initial phone interview for example. This is a common practice for companies, particularly ones that use recruiters to find their employees.  Having the first interview over the phone enables a company to weed out candidates without wasting time and money having a face to face meeting.  The second, third, fourth and even fifth interviews are designed to make sure the candidate has the skills to do the job, gels with the company’s culture and clicks with all of the people he or she will be working with.Panel interviews may be intimidating, but even with those there’s logic behind the perceived misery. According to Jaime S. Fall, vice president of workforce and talent development policy of HR Policy Association, a panel interview makes sense if the person interviewing will be working with all the people on the panel on a daily basis. “A lot of people may be affected by the output of the individual position the company is hiring for,” says Fall. “Instead of doing separate interviews it’s easier to do a panel.”Terry Pile, Principal Consultant of Career Advisors, knows all too well how grueling the interview process can be, especially in a competitive job market. She herself once had to go through 12 interviews before getting a job and recently counseled a client who went through a tough interview process. “It’s partially endurance test and partially to see if they are a good fit for the company,” says Pile. Her client who was interviewing for a mid-level job working for a small city had to answer fifteen essay questions before she was invited in for an interview. After that she was required to give a fifteen minute presentation, go through two panel interviews, write a sample letter for the local mayor, interview with another manager and write yet another essay about how she would approach the job.While the process was completely frustrating to the job candidate she went through it all because she really wanted the job. And even though she was passed up, Pile says it was a learning experience that put her in a better position for the next interview. “Even though she didn’t get the job they were very impressed with her,” says Pile. “She may not have been picked for that job but there could be other opportunities.”While it’s easy to throw in the towel and give up in frustration career experts say you need to weigh how much you want the job before making a rash decision. “The bottom line is, a hiring company has every right to require several rounds of high-pressure interviews,” says Rao. “And a job seeker has every right to walk away from the interview process if it seems abusive or futile.”last_img

You May Also Like..

Utah State seeks revenge on Boise State

first_imgFebruary 19, 2021 /Sports News – Local Utah State seeks revenge on Boise State FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailBOISE, Idaho (AP)-Utah State (14-6, 11-3) vs. Boise State (17-4, 13-3)ExtraMile Arena, Boise, Idaho; Friday, 8 p.m. MSTBOTTOM LINE: Boise State goes for the season sweep over Utah State after winning the previous matchup in Boise. The teams last went at it on Feb. 17, when the Broncos shot 44.4 percent from the field and went 15 for 17 from the free throw line en route to the 79-70 victory.STEPPING UP: Boise State’s Derrick Alston Jr. has averaged 17.4 points while Abu Kigab has put up 12.5 points and 5.8 rebounds. For the Aggies, Neemias Queta has averaged 13.5 points, 9.2 rebounds and three blocks while Marco Anthony has put up 11.2 points and 5.2 rebounds.ACCURATE ALSTON JR.: Alston has connected on 42.6 percent of the 122 3-pointers he’s attempted and has made 17 of 30 over his last five games. He’s also converted 84.4 percent of his free throws this season.UNDEFEATED WHEN: Boise State is a perfect 15-0 when it scores at least 73 points. The Broncos are 2-4 when scoring any fewer than that.FLOOR SPACING: Utah State’s Miller has attempted 106 3-pointers and connected on 41.5 percent of them, and is 9 for 23 over the last five games.STIFLING STATE: Utah State has held opposing teams to 38.8 percent shooting from the field this year, the ninth-lowest percentage among all Division I teams. Against conference opponents, the Aggies have held opposing shooters to 36.7 percent. Written bycenter_img Associated Presslast_img

Russian Navy Ship Heads to Mediterranean Sea

first_imgBack to overview,Home naval-today Russian Navy Ship Heads to Mediterranean Sea Russian Navy Ship Heads to Mediterranean Sea Training & Education A Russian Navy’s ship is steaming its way to the Mediterranean Sea, according to the Daily Sabah. View post tag: Mediterranean View post tag: heads View post tag: sea View post tag: ship View post tag: Naval View post tag: Navy View post tag: Russian View post tag: News by topic The ship, with hull number PM-56, passed the Dardanelles strait on Sunday, April 20th accompanied by Turkish Coast Guard ships during the passage. The final destination of the vessel has not been confirmed.PM-56 is an Amur class floating workshop ship of the Russian Navy which was built at a shipyard in Szczecin, Poland, in 1973.The most successful and most massive floating workshops were of “Polish” manufacture and have become PM pr.300, 301, 303 and 304. All of them were built in Poland at the Szczecin Shipyard.[mappress]Press Release, April 22, 2014; Image: Wikimedia April 22, 2014 Share this articlelast_img

Tribunal declares Union rules changes invalid

first_imgOutgoing Union President Mayank Banerjee’s controversial rules changes have been declared null by a tribunal, whilst Returning Officer Thomas Reynolds was cleared of interfering with Union elections.Banerjee, whose term ends at midnight on Saturday, fought for the rules changes, which involved the legalising of campaigning, including slates, and the introduction of a Re-Open Nominations (RON) option. In a poll he conducted in 5th week, over 90 per cent of voters approved the rule changes. However, Returning Officer Thomas Reynolds, who ran the Union elections in a 7th week which saw Roberto Weeden-Sanz elected as President for Trinity 2015 after he ran unopposed, issued an interpretation which declared the rule changes invalid during the election. At the time, Reynolds stated that in changing the rules via poll, Banerjee’s own interpretation of the rules was “wrong”, adding that under the conditions of the President’s poll, “It is insupportable for me to run these Elections in a transparent and correct manner.” Reynolds issued the ballot papers for the election without a RON option on them, despite Banerjee insisting that the rule changes would be in place for the election.Banerjee had originally claimed that if his rule changes were not in place for the election, he would resign. However, he told Cherwell that despite the tribunal’s decision that his rule changes were invalid, he would not be resigning in the few hours he had left of his tenure, also refusing to comment on the decision until after the tribunal’s report had been published.Furthermore, candidates who campaigned in the 7th week elections will not face a tribunal, Cherwell understands, as the deadline has passed for this term — despite the fact that the tribunal’s decision suggests that candidates who campaigned broke Union rules. Although Reynolds was cleared of interfering with the election, the tribunal’s statement does not specifically state that his interpretation of the rules was correct. It is understood that they will release a new interpretation of the rules in due course.Reynolds also refused to comment on the decision.It remains to be seen whether incoming president Lisa Wehden, who could also not be reached, will attempt to push through the rule changes in her tenure next term.last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *