Chinese Embassy in Sri Lanka breaks silence on news report

admin cxfhhv , , , , ,

The Chinese Embassy in Sri Lanka today broke its silence over a New York Times report published recently which revealed that China had funded former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s election campaign in 2015.The Embassy said in a statement that it had noticed the New York Times’ article published on June 25, as well as the clarifications and responses by various parties from Sri Lanka, criticizing it full of political prejudice and completely inconsistent with the fact. “It is encouraging that all sectors of the Sri Lankan society highly appreciate China’s tremendous support and selfless assistance for ending the civil war and post-war reconstruction in the Island nation,” the Embassy added. The Embassy stress that China has always been pursuing a friendly policy toward Sri Lanka, firmly supporting the latter’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, and opposing any country’s interference in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. The Embassy said that despite any interference from a third party, China would like to work together with Sri Lanka to actively implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries, and concentrate unwaveringly on our fixed goals, continuously promote the pragmatic cooperation under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiatives following the “golden rule” of “extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits”, to better benefit the two countries and the two peoples.The New York Times had revealed that at least $7.6 million was dispensed from the account of China Harbor Engineering Company which is involved in the Hambantota port, to affiliates of Rajapaksa’s campaign. Documents seen by The New York Times had revealed that with 10 days to go before the 2015 polls opened, around $3.7 million was distributed in checks: $678,000 to print campaign T-shirts and other promotional material and $297,000 to buy supporters gifts, including women’s saris. Another $38,000 was paid to a popular Buddhist monk who was supporting Rajapaksa’s electoral bid, while two checks totaling $1.7 million were delivered by volunteers to Temple Trees, his official residence.Most of the payments were from a subaccount controlled by China Harbor, named “HPDP Phase 2,” shorthand for Hambantota Port Development Project. (Colombo Gazette)

You May Also Like..

Russian Navy Ship Heads to Mediterranean Sea

first_imgBack to overview,Home naval-today Russian Navy Ship Heads to Mediterranean Sea Russian Navy Ship Heads to Mediterranean Sea Training & Education A Russian Navy’s ship is steaming its way to the Mediterranean Sea, according to the Daily Sabah. View post tag: Mediterranean View post tag: heads View post tag: sea View post tag: ship View post tag: Naval View post tag: Navy View post tag: Russian View post tag: News by topic The ship, with hull number PM-56, passed the Dardanelles strait on Sunday, April 20th accompanied by Turkish Coast Guard ships during the passage. The final destination of the vessel has not been confirmed.PM-56 is an Amur class floating workshop ship of the Russian Navy which was built at a shipyard in Szczecin, Poland, in 1973.The most successful and most massive floating workshops were of “Polish” manufacture and have become PM pr.300, 301, 303 and 304. All of them were built in Poland at the Szczecin Shipyard.[mappress]Press Release, April 22, 2014; Image: Wikimedia April 22, 2014 Share this articlelast_img

Tribunal declares Union rules changes invalid

first_imgOutgoing Union President Mayank Banerjee’s controversial rules changes have been declared null by a tribunal, whilst Returning Officer Thomas Reynolds was cleared of interfering with Union elections.Banerjee, whose term ends at midnight on Saturday, fought for the rules changes, which involved the legalising of campaigning, including slates, and the introduction of a Re-Open Nominations (RON) option. In a poll he conducted in 5th week, over 90 per cent of voters approved the rule changes. However, Returning Officer Thomas Reynolds, who ran the Union elections in a 7th week which saw Roberto Weeden-Sanz elected as President for Trinity 2015 after he ran unopposed, issued an interpretation which declared the rule changes invalid during the election. At the time, Reynolds stated that in changing the rules via poll, Banerjee’s own interpretation of the rules was “wrong”, adding that under the conditions of the President’s poll, “It is insupportable for me to run these Elections in a transparent and correct manner.” Reynolds issued the ballot papers for the election without a RON option on them, despite Banerjee insisting that the rule changes would be in place for the election.Banerjee had originally claimed that if his rule changes were not in place for the election, he would resign. However, he told Cherwell that despite the tribunal’s decision that his rule changes were invalid, he would not be resigning in the few hours he had left of his tenure, also refusing to comment on the decision until after the tribunal’s report had been published.Furthermore, candidates who campaigned in the 7th week elections will not face a tribunal, Cherwell understands, as the deadline has passed for this term — despite the fact that the tribunal’s decision suggests that candidates who campaigned broke Union rules. Although Reynolds was cleared of interfering with the election, the tribunal’s statement does not specifically state that his interpretation of the rules was correct. It is understood that they will release a new interpretation of the rules in due course.Reynolds also refused to comment on the decision.It remains to be seen whether incoming president Lisa Wehden, who could also not be reached, will attempt to push through the rule changes in her tenure next term.last_img

Hoboken mayor urges council not to move to make appointments to…

first_imgHOBOKEN– According to a press release from the city, Mayor Ravi Bhalla is asking the city council to reconsider its intention to transfer appointment authority of three full rent board members and two alternates from the mayor to the city council based on a legal analysis provided by corporation counsel.Corporation counsel notes that the city council’s proposed actions related to the Rent Leveling and Stabilization Board violate New Jersey State statutes.The quasi-judicial nine-member Rent Leveling and Stabilization Board is comprised of residents and tenants. It hears cases such as those of landlords who are applying for a hardship exception to the city’s long-term rent control laws, which keep rent increases to a few percents each year.During the last council meeting, the council approved five out of the seven mayoral appointments to the board, not including residents Warren Hall and Heath Urban whom Bhalla resubmitted for consideration at this week’s special council meeting, which will take place on Thursday, March 15 at 7 p.m.“State law is very clear about how appointments should be made to boards,” said Bhalla in the release. “Any decisions made by board members who are improperly appointed calls into question the validity of determinations made by the Rent Board. I hope that the Council will reconsider their actions and provide their advice and consent regarding the nominations of Mr. Hall and Mr. Urban, two highly qualified appointees who I know would serve our community well.”According to a March 5 memo from the city’s law department to the council, the new ordinance which would allow the council to appoint members to the board is in violation of the Faulkner Act.A March 12 memo from the mayor to the council states, “On March 5, the Law Department submitted a legal memorandum advising you that the City Council does not have the legal authority to unilaterally appoint members to the Rent Control Board … Despite the March 5th legal memorandum, this Ordinance is still on the March 15, 2018, City Council Agenda, along with a series of resolutions wherein the City Council appears to be illegally attempting to appoint Rent Control Board members. These items should be removed from the City Council agenda, as you have been advised that you do not have the legal authority to take such actions.” ×last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *