Enda Kenny says he will tell Trump in person that he disagrees

admin fkvuuq , , , , , , , , , , ,

first_img http://jrnl.ie/3213073 ‘Not in my name’: 30k sign Irish petition against Kenny visiting Trump on St Patrick’s Day>But at today’s press conference, he reiterated that he would not be cancelling the visit.“First of all, I think it is really important that I get to say face-to-face to the president the issues that are important to us,” said Kenny, adding that he disagreed with Trump’s latest immigration policy which has caused confusion and protests around the globe.“I don’t agree with it – I will obviously say that to the president and vice president when I meet with them.”Kenny explained that it has been tradition for the Taoiseach to travel to the White House for St Patrick’s Day. He said that it offers opportunities to speak to senators, congress people and mayors about issues that matter to the Irish. Enda Kenny and Theresa May say discussions were ‘constructive’ pic.twitter.com/6EuO8QuX3p— TheJournal Politics (@TJ_Politics) January 30, 2017 Image: Chris Bellew Fennell Photography During the press conference, Kenny also announced that the US pre-clearance policy at Dublin and Shannon airports will be reviewed. This afternoon it emerged that one person was turned away at Dublin Airport since Trump’s immigration ban.“I have asked for a complete review of pre-clearance facilities here in Ireland,” said Kenny.The Taoiseach pointed out that pre-clearance at Irish airports has been an enormous convenience in terms of efficiency and economics over the years.While he said he did not agree with Trump’s immigration policy, he said it was “important to keep contact very much alive” between the two countries. Tweet thisShare on FacebookEmail this article By Christina Finn Monday 30 Jan 2017, 7:41 PM 116 Comments I think it’s really important that I be able to say face-to-face to the President the issues that are of importance to us.I don’t want a situation where the 35 million Irish-Americans who sign on for connections with this country or the 50,000 undocumented Irish that are in the States are left without contact or connection. Both leaders said any manifestation of a hard border in the North would have “very negative consequences”.May and Kenny reiterated each other’s points about the border issue, stating they wanted it to be as “seamless”, “friction free” and as “trouble-free” as possible.Describing their earlier private discussion as “frank” and “constructive”, Kenny said both countries were in agreement that the trading ties between the two countries should be “recognised and facilitated” as negotiations go forward.He said this was an “absolute priority” for the Irish government. An Taoiseach Enda Kenny TD with British Prime Minister Theresa May during their meeting at Government buildings today in Dublin. Source: Chris Bellew Fennell PhotographyRead: One person turned away at Dublin Airport since Trump’s travel ban> So I think it is more important now than ever before that we speak face-to-face with the American president and explain to him the issues and the matters of  importance to us here. TAOISEACH ENDA KENNY has said he disagrees with US President Donald Trump’s immigration travel ban and said he will tell him that to his face when he meets him during his St Patrick’s Day visit.In a joint press conference with UK Prime Minister Theresa May in Government Buildings this afternoon, the Taoiseach said he intended to accept Trump’s invitation to the White House in March for various reasons.Pressure has been mounting on the Taoiseach over the weekend to snub the invitation, with over 30,000 people signing an online petition calling on him not to visit. Source: TheJournal Politics/Twittercenter_img Image: Chris Bellew Fennell Photography Enda Kenny says he will tell Trump in person that he disagrees with his travel ban The UK Prime Minister Theresa May is in Dublin today to meet Taoiseach Enda Kenny. We have had a great influence in the US over the years, we still have that influence and we intend to use it. Jan 30th 2017, 7:41 PM Enda Kenny says he does not agree with Trump’s immigration policy and he will tell Trump and Pence that when he meets them pic.twitter.com/6beODqpGCd— TheJournal Politics (@TJ_Politics) January 30, 2017 Source: PA Wire/PA ImagesNorthern IrelandIn relation to Brexit and Northern Ireland, May said they were both she and Kenny were “personally committed to strengthening the relationship” between Ireland and the UK.“I know for the people of Ireland and Northern Ireland, the ability to move freely across the border is an essential part of daily life, which is why the Taoiseach and I have both been clear that there will be no return to the borders of the past,” said the UK Prime Minister. Source: TheJournal Politics/Twitter Source: TheJournal.ie/YouTubeOn her first visit to Dublin as UK prime minister, May was also asked about Donald Trump.While there have been calls for Kenny to boycott the St Patrick’s Day trip to the White House, May is feeling the heat over a planned trip by Trump to the UK announced for later this year.“The US is a close ally of the United Kingdom. We work together across many areas of mutual interest,” she said.Thousands of people have signed a petition calling for the Trump invitation to be revoked. However, when asked about it today, May said:That invitation stands. Short URL As the clock ticks down, get all the best Brexit news and analysis in your inbox: Share554 Tweet Email 18,527 Views last_img

You May Also Like..


first_img Previous Article Next Article This week’s lettersDTI will try to avoid damaging the job boards As the Minister responsible for the Government’s review of the conduct ofemployment agencies and employment businesses regulations, I can assurePersonnel Today that our aim is not to damage internet jobs boards, but toprotect job-seekers and employers from unscrupulous agencies (News, 15October). To help us get the balance right, I urge your readers to log on towww.dti.gov.uk/er, read our consultation in the publications section and sendconsidered comments and evidence to [email protected] Alan Johnson MP Minister of State for Employment Relations, Industry and the Regions, Departmentof Trade and Industry People, not boards, make strategy happen I have enjoyed your series Delivering HR Strategy, and Jane Lewis’ article(Features, 8 October). But the argument Lewis presents – that the ‘downstream alignment’ school ofJohn Purcell has been superseded by Paul Kearns’ offensive‘HR-in-the-boardroom-driving-the-business-strategy’ camp – itself is anoutmoded distinction. Neither business nor HR strategies are wholly rational, planned andtop-down-implemented phenomena. Early and influential HR involvement iscritical, but as John Purcell points out, there is a danger in our currenttough economic climate of HR strategies becoming ‘an illusion’ in theboardroom. As your series title suggests – delivery is key. Purcell’s latest research for the CIPD focuses on this conundrum ofstrategic delivery. Underneath the statistical correlations between HR policiesand business success, this research unpacks some of the key practicalcomponents of the ‘black box’ of HR strategy. Effective first line managers and fully-skilled employees – supported byappropriate HR practices and processes – are all demonstrated by the researchto be critical to performance and strategic delivery. As one of the employees in a hospital case study explains, “when I camehere a year ago it was very unsettled. Now we have a strong team out there,encouraging you, and in return you want to do the job to the best of yourability”. Boards, or even their HR executives, do not make strategy happen. People do.Duncan Brown Assistant director general, CIPD Have you responded to the records code? The Records Management Code is considered by many to be a bureaucraticburden (News, 8 October). It appears that employers should now seek staff permission to recordsickness details, include confidentiality clauses in HR personnel contracts,provide data handling training for HR operatives, include data protectionrights in staff induction programmes, provide employees with personal detailson an annual basis and introduce a single HR database. Not surprisingly, HR professionals believe this is impractical and willincrease administrative work. We recently sponsored research that shows that 32 per cent of HRprofessionals thought that the code was too complex, while 47 per cent hadnever even heard of it. There must be a considerable number of organisations who cannot be dealingwith the new code of practice adequately. More information on the new codeneeds to be made easily available to employers. Furthermore, HR professionals need to carefully review and upgrade their HRinformation systems in order to ensure compliance. Peter Collinson Director, Midland Software Limited Businesses must stop poor management rot I read with interest Karina Ward’s views on poor training being to blame forbad management and low productivity (Letters, 22 October). While I strongly agree that we need to take a step back and assess theshortcomings of British companies, I am not convinced UK industry is ready forthis level of self-criticism. Following the DTI’s announcement that US business guru, Michael Porter, willlead an inquiry into the failings of British management (News, 22 October), Iwas shocked to hear various business commentators criticising the decision to involvean American. It’s time for UK companies to stop naval-gazing and face reality: withoutworld-class managers and leaders, the British economy will continue to flag,and if businesses don’t shape up soon, they could be committing commercialsuicide. Let’s hope businesses in the UK learn what they can from Michael Porter andstop the rot of poor management. Roy Davis Head of communications, SHL UK Comments are closed. LettersOn 5 Nov 2002 in Personnel Today Related posts:No related photos.last_img

Football pay cap could be illegal

first_imgRelated posts:No related photos. Comments are closed. Previous Article Next Article Football pay cap could be illegalOn 3 Dec 2002 in Personnel Today The proposed introduction of a salary cap on Nationwide League footballplayers and the G14 group of Europe’s elite teams may be illegal. The precarious nature of football finances has prompted the NationwideLeague chairman to reconsider the amount it pays top stars by imposing a wagecap. Europe’s top 14 clubs have also agreed to impose a cap by 2005, in which nomore than 70 per cent of turnover could be used on players wages. However, Owen Eastwood, a sports specialist at law firm Lewis Silkin, believesthe salary cap is only enforceable if it has been agreed by the union and isincluded as part of a collective bargaining agreement. “If there is no collective bargaining agreement, it is vulnerable to alegal challenge,” he said. last_img

There’s no need to fear a return of the unions

first_imgThere’s no need to fear a return of the unionsOn 13 May 2003 in Personnel Today Comments are closed. The merest hint of industrial unrest always prompts an airing of that oldrock song, Part of the Union. For a time though, the turntables have beensilent. Having peaked with 10 million in the 1970s, union membership slumped tobelow 8 million in the 1980s and 1990s as employment switched away frommanufacturing to services, and legislation curbed union power. Now unions are staging a comeback. High-profile strikes by firefighters andrail workers evoke memories of times past. So much so that Labour governmentministers themselves express public concern at an emerging new generation ofunion militants. The Government’s fairness at work legislation has given added impetus tounion recognition. Today, almost two out of three public sector workers areunionised, compared with less than one in five in private firms. Unions arealso central players in the ongoing reform of public sector service delivery. The next couple of years might witness the most disruptive strike activitysince Mrs Thatcher took on Arthur Scargill in the 1980s. But industrial striferemains far less prevalent than in the 1970s. In 2001, the UK lost 20 workingdays per 1,000 employees to strikes – much lower than the EU (43 days) and OECD(29 days) averages. Even so, it is clear the employment relations environment within which theHR community operates is entering a new phase. Some are understandably wary ofthe possible consequences, yet experience shows that responsible trade unions,working in partnership with employers, should be embraced rather than treatedwith suspicion. Unions serve as an important channel, building shared-interestrelations with employees to help raise productivity and improve workingconditions. True, unions can at times abuse their role. The legitimate right of unionsto be recognised must therefore always be tempered by appropriate restrictionsdesigned to ensure they behave responsibly. In this respect the currenttreatment of unions in UK law, as most recently modified by the EmploymentRelations Act 1999, would seem about right. The Government’s recent conclusion that there is as yet no case forwholesale changes to the legislation seems justified, so long as employersadopt the spirit as well as letter of the current law, and do not attempt toexercise legal loopholes to obstruct recognition. The overriding object for all – government, employers and trade unions –must be to build upon the positive partnerships of recent years. At nationallevel, employers’ organisations should support Brendan Barber’s efforts as hetakes over from John Monks at the TUC’s helm. He faces a tricky task insteering the union movement through interesting times ahead. It is highly unlikely that the high employment, high productivity and highpublic service delivery outcomes that the UK needs can emerge in the absence ofgood relations with the unions. By John Philpott, Chief economist, CIPD Related posts:No related photos. Previous Article Next Articlelast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *